Tactics |
It All Depends
|
From Backgammon Times, Volume 2, Number 3, Summer 1982. |
|
|
I don't recall my exact answer (something like, "It depends on the position and the number rolled") except that it left my friend unsatisfied and appreciably no better off than he had been before. What this little encounter did make me realize, however, was how difficult it is to verbalize what is essentially a nonverbal process.
Experts have so much experience and familiarity with backgammon positions that the step by step approach average players are required to go through to find an answer has largely disappeared from their own games. Nevertheless, that process is still there. It is just not as visible and is performed at much greater speed by top players than by lesser lights.
The other thing I realized was that my friend thought that there were general principles I knew of that enabled me to instantly "solve" the problems in the position. That is an illusion and completely untrue (good players permit this impression, however, for purposes of ego and intimidation).
There are no easy answers to finding good moves at backgammon. Experience and familiarity merely enable the expert to find good moves more easily. Each position must be broken down to its essentials, with the relevant factors weighed against each other to eventually arrive at a decision.
To illustrate my point (and apologize to my friend for my previous vague answer) I then listed those factors (below) that I considered pertinent in assessing a position of the type shown. Experts of course will disagree on such a list but not significantly enough to alter the main argument.
|
Then, using the same position, I played the following numbers for Black, accompanied by my evaluation of each move:
Roll | Move | Reasons |
4-2 | 8/6, 8/4 | C predominates. |
6-2 | 8/2, 8/6 | C again. |
6-1 | 8/2, 4/3* | G and A combined win out. |
5-3 | 8/3*, 6/3 | E and F (8/3*, 8/5 leaves too many shots next roll). |
4-1 | 8/3* | Can't stand H (6/5, 6/2); therefore left with G. |
Though my model isn't perfect it does show, to some extent, how good players think about positions. Positions, numbers, and criteria for evaluating positions are in constant flux, but the procedure for choosing a move or making a decision in backgammon remains pretty much the same.
What separates good players from weaker ones is greater understanding of the relevant positional factors in positions and greater skill in weighing them against each other to make decisions.
To impart some flavor of this thinking process I gave my friend (and now you, the reader) the following exercise.
The eight positions below are all very similar to our original. Your task is to play the numbers next to each diagram for Black and then evaluate your move using the criteria listed in the article. There is no correct set of solutions but your answers will reflect how you weigh the various factors to make your moves. If you wish to compare, my answers follow.
P.S. You may include criteria of your own. I recommend this exercise if you have trouble organizing your backgammon thinking. Simply choose a position you don't understand, make a list of criteria you think apply to the position, and then choose your move in the position for all the numbers on the dice, including, of course, your own evaluation.
Play the following rolls for Black in each position:
Black to play 3-2, 3-1, 4-2, 4-1, 5-3, 6-1, 6-2. |
Black to play 3-2, 4-2, 4-1, 6-1, 6-2, 5-3. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black to play 3-2, 3-1, 4-2, 6-2, 6-1, 5-3. |
Black to play 5-1, 5-2, 4-2, 4-1, 5-3, 4-3. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black to play 3-2, 3-1, 4-2, 5-2, 5-1. |
Black to play 5-3, 4-3, 6-1, 6-2, 3-2, 3-1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black to play 3-2, 4-2, 5-3, 6-1, 6-2, 4-1. |
Black to play 3-2, 3-1, 5-2, 4-3, 5-1, 6-1, 6-2. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
More articles by Mike Senkiewicz | |
More articles on tactics | |
Return to: Backgammon Galore |