Tournaments

 Compensating for byes

 From: Hank Youngerman Address: hankyoungerman@home.com Date: 2 December 1998 Subject: Byes in tournaments Forum: rec.games.backgammon Google: 36649ec6.94734699@news

```I played in my first F2F tournament in a while a few weeks back.  Nine
players entered the non-expert division, meaning that two players did
not get a first-round bye and seven did.

I was wondering if tournaments have ever tried to equalize the effect
of byes by handicapping later matches.  For example, suppose 12
players enter, playing 11-point matches.  I don't have my match equity
table handy (or memorized) but it seems that leading 3-0 to 11 would
be about 67% match equity, roughly.  It would seem to be fair, then,
that 8 players would play the first round, and each winner would start
the second-round match with a 3-0 lead. This would give each of the 12
players a 1/3 chance of reaching the third round.

Has anyone ever done this in practice?
```

 Carlo Melzi  writes: ```Just a few time ago I started to study something similar, because one of my friend gave me the idea. Unfortunately, some problems were just too big: 1) The system 67%-33% works only if the total numbers of players is 12 or 24, because there is the same number of byes and pre-turns. In all the other situations, a player who had to play a pre-turn would clearly prefer to play a player who had a bye in the second round, in order to start with an advantage (67% vs. 50%). Thus, we should re-arrange third, fourth (and so on) rounds to give the same probability of winning the tournament to all the players AFTER the draw. I studied the "10-players" tournament and the math should be this: A,B,C,D play a pre-turn. The winners (let's say A and C) play then E and F having a score advantage that gives them 67% in the match. G,H,I,L play normally their round. In the semifinals, the winners of A-E and C-F should start with a 60% advantage versus (let's say) G and I. This way every player would have a 10% chance to win the tournament AFTER the draw. A,B,C,D: 50*67*60*50=10 E,F: 33*60*50=10 G,H,I,L: 50*40*50=10 As you can see, this is rather complicate (and it's even more with more players). 2) It's not always so easy to give precisely 66.67% in a match (in a 7pts tournament, using Neil's Numbers, starting from 2-0 gives 63% and 3-0 gives 69.5%; 0 - -3 gives 66%.......but it's no more a 7pts tournament!!! :-) ) ```

 Steen Ladelund  writes: ```In Aarhus, Denmark where I live, we have a tournament every two weeks where we auction the byes. I think this is a beutifull, simple and fair way of dealing with byes in knock-out designs involving entry fees. I wonder if its used elsewhere? -- Steen Ladelund * Dep. of Theor. Statistics, office H2.14 * University of Århus. tlf: (+45) 8942 3499 * Ny Munkegade, bygn. 530 E-mail: ladelund@imf.au.dk * 8000 Århus, Denmark. ```

### Tournaments

Adjusting to face-to-face play  (Paul Epstein+, Feb 2006)
Adjusting to face-to-face play  (Daniel Murphy, June 1999)
Avoiding disputes  (Kit Woolsey+, Oct 2007)
Baffle box to roll dice  (Ken Bame, Mar 2012)
Calcutta auctions  (David Moeser, Nov 2001)
Calcutta auctions  (Roland Scheicher+, Dec 1998)
Calcutta auctions  (Anthony R Wuersch, Oct 1994)
Calcutta problems  (Marty Storer, Dec 2002)
Clock ethics  (Patrick Gibson+, Mar 2009)
Clock rules--Digital clocks  (Chuck Bower+, Oct 2003)
Clock rules--End of turn  (Carlo Melzi+, July 2001)
Clock rules--How do they work?  (Gregg Cattanach, Oct 2002)
Clock rules--Illegal move  (Brendan Burgess+, Feb 2000)
Clock rules--Why forfeit instead of penalty points?  (neilkaz, Sept 2010)
Clocks and older players  (Stick+, July 2010)
Clocks--Arguments against them  (Timothy Chow, Jan 2011)
Clocks--Common arguments against  (Chuck Bower, Feb 2006)
Clocks--Losing on time  (Jason Lee+, Mar 2004)
Clocks--Pros and cons  (Michael Strato+, Jan 2004)
Clocks--Should they be part of the game?  (Kit Woolsey, June 1995)
Clocks--Why use them  (Stick, Jan 2011)
Compensating for byes  (Hank Youngerman+, Dec 1998)
Factors that affect attendance  (Stick, Oct 2009)
"Fighter's bracket"  (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2010)
First backgammon tournament  (Mislav Radica+, May 2007)
First backgammon tournament  (Ed Collins+, Dec 2006)
Hedging  (Jason Lee+, Apr 2009)
Hedging  (Marv Porten+, Feb 2009)
Hitting clock instead of rolling  (Bob Glass+, Mar 2010)
Keeping score during a match  (Gregg Cattanach, June 2007)
Links to tournament rules  (Daniel Murphy, Oct 2009)
Major tournament attendance 1998-2008  (Daniel Murphy, July 2008)
Making notes during play  (Randy Pals+, Aug 2008)
Manually recording a match  (Kevin P+, Apr 2007)
Manually recording a match  (gammonus+, Feb 2006)
Manually recording a match  (Daniel Murphy, Aug 1999)
New U.S. Rules  (Gregg Cattanach+, Dec 2007)
Newbie questions  (Donald Kahn, Oct 1999)
Playing at Monte Carlo  (Achim, July 2007)
Playing-off 3 remaining players  (Gregg Cattanach+, Apr 2007)
Recording matches  (Robert Maier, May 2009)
Recording matches  (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2003)
Recording matches  (Sean Dakin+, Aug 1999)
Round robins  (Hank Youngerman, Nov 2001)
Rules for doubles play (with a partner)  (steve+, May 2012)
Seeding  (Roland Scheicher+, Dec 1998)
Skill level  (Kirk J. Rupnik+, Nov 1998)
Skill levels  (Leonardo Jerkovic, Aug 2012)
"Stop pots"  (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2010)
Swiss format  (Osman Guner+, May 2001)
Swiss format  (Osman Guner, Oct 1998)
Swiss format  (Hank Youngerman+, Mar 1998)
Tournament rules  (Daniel Murphy, Apr 2001)
Tournament rules links  (Daniel Murphy, Oct 2009)
Types of events  (Daniel Murphy, Nov 1997)
Uniform rules and procedures?  (Michael Crane+, Mar 2003)
Variable side pools  (Art Grater+, July 2011)
Vegas trip report (fall 2004)  (Gregg Cattanach, Nov 2004)
Vegas trip report (spring 2005)  (Gregg Cattanach, May 2005)
Videotaping matches  (André Nicoulin+, Nov 2000)
What is a "Monrad format"?  (Daniel Murphy, Sept 2000)
What is a "side pool"?  (Daniel Murphy, Nov 1997)