Forum Archive :
Match Equities
I've received a few requests for a match equity table more
comprehensible than the last one I posted.
Here are two such tables. The first (expressed in points-to-go) was
calculated by Kit Woolsey (he's a school of backgammon thought!).
The second table is the minimum winning chance (in %s) to take
an initial double (2 cube). Gammons are NOT taken into account.
It it based on the percentages in table 1.
Table 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 50 70 75 83 85 90 91 94 95 97 97 98 98 99 99
2 30 50 60 68 75 81 85 88 91 93 94 95 96 97 98
3 25 40 50 59 66 71 76 80 84 87 90 92 94 95 96
4 17 32 41 50 58 64 70 75 79 83 86 88 90 92 93
5 15 25 34 42 50 57 63 68 73 77 81 84 87 89 90
6 10 19 29 36 43 50 56 62 67 72 76 79 82 85 87
7 9 15 24 30 37 44 50 56 61 66 70 74 78 81 84
8 6 12 20 25 32 38 44 50 55 60 65 69 73 77 80
9 5 9 16 21 27 33 39 45 50 55 60 64 68 72 76
10 3 7 13 17 23 28 34 40 45 50 55 60 64 68 71
11 3 6 10 14 19 24 30 35 40 45 50 55 59 63 67
12 2 5 8 12 16 21 26 31 36 40 45 50 54 58 62
13 2 4 6 10 13 18 22 27 32 36 41 46 50 54 58
14 1 3 5 8 11 15 19 23 28 32 37 42 46 50 54
15 1 2 4 7 10 13 16 20 24 29 33 38 42 46 50
Table 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1
2 30 29 20 20 22 24 21 20 25 22 14 17 20 25
3 25 30 23 26 23 20 22 21 24 23 27 25 29 20
4 17 35 25 26 26 22 25 24 22 27 25 20 22 25
5 27 29 26 25 28 27 26 24 26 24 27 23 27 22
6 25 29 32 24 25 26 24 26 24 26 25 21 23 27
7 29 24 33 23 26 27 25 26 24 25 22 24 27 25
8 23 26 33 22 28 25 25 26 23 24 26 24 25 29
9 25 21 33 24 26 26 26 27 24 25 26 22 24 25
10 19 24 33 21 29 24 27 29 25 25 26 28 24 25
11 25 23 27 24 26 25 29 25 25 25 26 28 24 24
12 20 27 25 27 25 28 26 26 26 21 25 26 22 24
13 29 25 20 31 21 29 24 28 28 22 26 28 24 24
14 17 29 22 27 23 27 25 24 29 24 28 29 25 25
15 20 20 25 33 27 25 21 25 25 29 24 29 25 25
|
|
|
|
Match Equities
- Constructing a match equity table (Walter Trice, Apr 2000)
- Does it matter which match equity table you use? (Klaus Evers+, Nov 2005)
- Does it matter which match equity table you use? (Achim Mueller+, Dec 2003)
- Does it matter which match equity table you use? (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2001)
- ME Table: Big Brother (Peter Fankhauser, July 1996)
- ME Table: Dunstan (Ian Dunstan+, Aug 2004)
- ME Table: Escoffery (David Escoffery, Nov 1991)
- ME Table: Friedman (Elliott C Winslow, Oct 1991)
- ME Table: Kazaross (Neil Kazaross, Dec 2003)
- ME Table: Kazaross-XG2 (neilkaz, Aug 2011)
- ME Table: Rockwell-Kazaross (Chuck Bower+, June 2010)
- ME Table: Snowie (Chase, Apr 2002)
- ME Table: Snowie (Harald Retter, Aug 1998)
- ME Table: Woolsey (Raccoon, Apr 2006)
- ME Table: Woolsey (Kit Woolsey, May 1994)
- ME Table: Woolsey (William R. Tallmadge, Jan 1994)
- ME Table: Zadeh (Jørn Thyssen, Mar 2004)
- ME Table: Zorba (Robert-Jan Veldhuizen+, Dec 2003)
- ME at 1-away/2-away (crawford) (Fabrice Liardet+, Nov 2007)
- ME at 1-away/2-away (crawford) (Ian Shaw+, Apr 2003)
- Match equities--an alternate view (Durf Freund, Oct 1994)
- Neil's new numbers (neilkaz, Aug 2011)
- Neil's numbers (Kit Woolsey+, Oct 1994)
- On calculating match equity tables (Neil Kazaross, July 2004)
- Turner formula (Gregg Cattanach, Feb 2003)
- Turner formula (Stephen Turner, June 1994)
- Using a match equity table (Michael J. Zehr, June 1992)
- Value of free drop (Neil Kazaross, Oct 2002)
- Which match equity table is best? (Martin Krainer+, Oct 2003)
- Which match equity table is best? (Ian Shaw+, Dec 2001)
- Why use a match equity table? (Kit Woolsey, Feb 1999)
- Worth memorizing? (Alef Rosenbaum+, Feb 2003)
From GammOnLine
Long message
Recommended reading
Recent addition
|
| |
|